The Stake That Was Right the Day It Was Tied
- nathanaelschlecht2
- Jul 24
- 3 min read

A nursery worker plants a young tree and ties it to a stake, the tie sized to the trunk’s exact diameter that afternoon, snug enough to hold the sapling upright against wind while its roots are still finding their grip in the soil…. This is not overcaution. A tree this young cannot stand on its own yet, and the stake isn’t a crutch, it’s the only reason the tree makes it to the point where it won’t need one. The tie is the correct choice, and the worker did the job right.
What the job doesn’t include, most of the time, is coming back. The tree keeps doing what trees do, adding a ring of growth every year, the trunk widening steadily under bark that has no way of announcing itself to anyone standing outside. The tie stays exactly the size it was the day it was cut, because nobody scheduled a return visit, because the tree looked fine, because a tie that’s holding doesn’t look like a problem. It takes years before the failure becomes visible, and by then it isn’t a failure of the stake, it’s a groove cut into the trunk itself, a permanent scar where the tree grew around the one thing that used to hold it up, the wood swelling on either side of a tie that never loosened to let it pass.
There’s a reality of this that has nothing to do with trees. A person builds a way of managing what’s around them at an age when that way of managing was exactly right, sized correctly to a nervous system that genuinely could not have stood without it yet.
Nobody ties a tie wrong on purpose. The vigilance, the self-sufficiency, the particular way of reading a room before trusting it, all of it did the job it was cut for, at the diameter the person actually was at the time.
The trunk keeps widening after that, the way trunks do, adding what a life adds, more capacity, more range, more of what maturity is supposed to bring. But the tie was never scheduled for a return visit either. It doesn’t get louder as the mismatch grows, it doesn’t advertise itself, because a person who is still managing, still functioning, still standing upright, does not look like someone whose capacity has outgrown its support. The tie simply stays the size it was cut, and the growth that should have moved freely past it starts, instead to grow around it.
This is why it so rarely reads as a stake problem when the groove finally becomes visible.
It reads as something wrong with the tree, a flaw in the wood, when the wood did exactly what wood does, and the only mistake in the whole system was a return visit nobody made.
An arborist checking on a young tree loosens the tie a little more every season, not because the first tie was wrong, but because right, for a growing season, is not a fact you get to set once….
It’s a question you have to keep asking, at every width the trunk becomes.
A tie sized for a sapling isn't wrong. It just isn't sized for the tree the sapling becomes, unless someone comes back to check. The same is true of the ways a person learns to cope early, worth revisiting rather than assuming either that they still fit or that they never did.
For more essays like this, subscribe to The Regulated Mind on Substack.
Nando Schlecht, LAC, is a trauma therapist in Tucson, AZ, specializing in complex trauma, dissociation, and nervous system regulation through DBR, Brainspotting, Ego State Therapy, and IFS-informed work. Sessions available in Tucson, AZ, and to adults across the state via online therapy Arizona.
Schedule a consultation: https://www.nandotherapy.com/therapy-contact




Comments