top of page

What a Working System Never Tells You

Close-up of an open mechanical watch movement showing gears and jeweled bearings, representing nervous system recalibration, Tucson therapist
Every gear here was cut for a movement it hasn’t kept in years.

A person’s way of coping keeps running, keeps performing, keeps getting them through the day without incident, and the smoothness itself becomes the reason nobody, including the person, ever schedules a check on it…. A system that’s failing sends a signal. A system that’s succeeding sends nothing at all, and a nervous system operating exactly the way it always has, with no crisis attached, produces no internal prompt to ask whether it’s still correctly rated for what it’s actually carrying now. The absence of a problem gets read as evidence of soundness, when it may only be evidence that nobody’s inspected the mechanism in years.


Building managers know this problem by a different name. Every elevator carries a certificate, due for renewal on a schedule that has nothing to do with whether the elevator is working. It could run flawlessly for a decade, and the certificate would still expire on time, because the certificate was never a measure of whether the elevator works today. It’s a measure of whether anyone has actually checked, recently, that it still would under conditions nobody has tested it against lately. An elevator that’s never missed a trip and an elevator that’s structurally sound are not the same claim, though they get treated as though they are, right up until the day they aren’t.


This is the quiet failure mode, the one that doesn’t announce itself the way a stuck door or a grinding cable would. A building with an elevator running perfectly smoothly has no internal signal telling anyone to schedule an inspection, because the only thing generating urgency in most systems is a problem, and this system, by definition, doesn’t have one yet. The certificate lapsing is not a crisis. Nobody is trapped between floors.


The building manager has forty other things demanding attention today, and an elevator that works is, understandably, not one of them. So, the folder sits, the date passes, and the only thing standing between smooth operation and an actual failure is a schedule nobody’s tracking anymore, because tracking it required treating “still working” and “still sound” as two different questions, which takes a kind of discipline that success rarely rewards.


The same asymmetry runs underneath a person. Coping that performs well produces no evidence against itself, and evidence against itself is the only thing that would normally prompt a second look. This is what makes it a different failure than the one before it, the tree that outgrows its stake. That mismatch eventually writes itself into the bark, visible to anyone who checks. This one doesn’t write itself anywhere. It can run fine for years past the point where it should have been examined, because working and being sound aren’t verified by the same evidence, and only one of them announces itself without being asked.


Something like Brainspotting or DBR functions less like a repair, in this frame, and more like the inspection itself, a way of actually looking at what a system is carrying rather than waiting for it to fail before finding out. The building manager who renews the certificate on schedule, whether or not anything seems wrong, isn’t being paranoid.


She’s simply refusing to let smooth operation stand in for an answer to a question smooth operation was never equipped to answer.


Most elevators, inspected, turn out fine. The point was never to expect otherwise. The point was that fine is a finding, not an assumption, and only one of those can be trusted.


A watch movement can be cut perfectly and still be running at the wrong rate for the life it's measuring now. Recalibrating that rate, rather than assuming either that it's fine or that it's broken, is close to what this part of the work actually looks like.

For more essays like this, subscribe to The Regulated Mind on Substack.


Nando Schlecht, LAC, is a trauma therapist in Tucson, AZ, specializing in complex trauma, dissociation, and nervous system regulation through DBR, Brainspotting, Ego State Therapy, and IFS-informed work. Sessions available in Tucson, AZ, and to adults across the state via online therapy Arizona.


Comments


bottom of page