top of page

Why Am I Always Waiting for Something Bad to Happen?

Sep 2
2 min read

Updated: 6 days ago

Tucson, Arizona cityscape with downtown buildings and residential areas below the Santa Catalina Mountains.
“Aerial view of Tucson, Arizona, with downtown high-rises and neighborhoods spread beneath the Santa Catalina Mountains.

Nothing is actually wrong right now, but still, there’s this underlying uncomfortability underneath everything, a sense that the other shoe hasn’t dropped yet, that whatever’s good right now is probably temporary. Good news can trigger it as easily as bad news does, sometimes more, because good news raises the stakes of what there is to lose.


This isn’t pessimism in the ordinary sense because it may very well be hypervigilance, a nervous system state built around scanning for threat, and it tends to develop for a reason.


For a nervous system that’s learned, usually early, that calm doesn’t last, staying braced can actually feel safer than relaxing. If good periods in the past were reliably followed by something bad, whether that was chaos at home, an unpredictable caregiver, or just long stretches where safety turned out to be conditional, the nervous system adapts. It stops trusting calm as information. Instead, calm starts to register as the quiet before something, rather than as an actual resting state.


Hypervigilance isn’t really a mindset. It’s a physiological posture, closer to a muscle staying tensed than a belief being held. The body stays in a low level of readiness, monitoring for signs of danger even when nothing in the present moment warrants it. This takes energy, and it takes it constantly, which is part of why chronic hypervigilance is so often accompanied by fatigue that doesn’t track with how much is actually happening day to day.


Working with hypervigilance usually starts with recognizing it as a learned nervous system state rather than as an accurate read on the present. The reason why the distinction matters is because trying to reason your way out of hypervigilance doesn’t typically work. It’s coming from a physiological baseline that needs to actually shift.


Approaches that work directly with the nervous system tend to be more effective here than talk-based reassurance alone, since reassurance is exactly the kind of input a hypervigilant system has learned not to fully trust. Brainspotting, DBR, and Ego State Therapy work with the underlying activation rather than only with the thoughts sitting on top of it, which is often what allows the baseline itself to change.


Nathanael "Nando" Schlecht is the founder of Nando Therapy, a Licensed Associate Counselor and trauma therapist based in Tucson, AZ, specializing in complex trauma, dissociation, and nervous system regulation. He is trained in DBR, Brainspotting, Ego State Therapy, EMDR, and ERP (Exposure and Response Prevention). Offering in-person sessions in Tucson and online therapy throughout Arizona.

For more reflections on nervous system patterns and relational dynamics, subscribe to The Regulated Mind on Substack.




Related Reading:




Comments


bottom of page